Date(s) of Order
Authored by Lakshmi Rengarajan
SEBI had issued the Frequently Asked Questions (
Authored by Aishwarya Lakshmi VM & Padma Akila R
| Forum |
Madurai Bench of the Hon
Authored by Lakshmi Rengarajan
The High Court of Madras passed an order dated 09th October 2020, setting aside the order (
Authored by N V Saisunder
The IPAB has, vide its recent decision on 25th August 2020, directed the Registrar of Trademarks to publish that
Authored by N V Saisunder
The Department for Promotion of Industry and Internal Trade (DPIIT) of the Ministry of Commerce and Industry, vide notification dated 19th October 2020, has amended certain rules under the original Patent rules 2003, pursuant to the Patents (Amendment) Rules, 2020.(
Authored by Lakshmi Rengarajan
Promoters, directors and designated employees (
Authored by Vignesh Kumar & Padma Akila
Date(s) of Order
Authored by Aishwarya Lakshmi VM
| Applicant: Raghav Commercial Ltd. |
Date of the guidance:
Authored by Aishwarya Lakshmi VM
| In the matter of: TRADING ACTIVITIES OF PANKAJ J. SHAH HUF AND CONNECTED ENTITIES IN THE SCRIPS OF
Authored by Ammu Brigit
Introduction:
Section 31D, which was introduced into the Indian Copyright Act, 1957 (the
The Department for Promotion of Industry and Internal Trade, Ministry of Commerce and Industry, has recently notified the Geographical Indications of Goods (Registration and Protection) (Amendment) Rules, 2020 (
On 22nd September 2020, Intellectual Property Appellate Board(IPAB) released a public notice, which can be accessed on https://copyright.gov.in/Documents/PublicNotice43_1.pdf
Authored by Lakshmi Rengarajan
Promoters of listed companies that do not expeditiously redress investor complaints will have their shareholding frozen as per SEBI
Rule based governance of Indian companies was ushered in by the Companies Act, 2013 and the related rules. The rules even went to the extent of prescribing matters to be stated by directors if they were to attend meetings by video conferencing. The rules traversed into areas that the law did not, and at times the law stated matters that were increasing duplication of information.
One such requirement was to append an
Authored by R. Padma Akila
In the matter of:
Authored by Aishwarya Lakshmi VM.
| Applicant: Way to Wealth Brokers Pvt. Ltd. |
Date of the guidance: 20.07.2020 |
Factual Background
(i) The Applicant is a stockbroker registered with SEBI. They have received a proposal from a listed company to fund the RSU (Restricted Stock Unit) issued by the listed company to its employees, to enable the employees to exercise the RSUs without paying for the same upfront.
(ii) The amount that will be funded by the Applicant is the face value of the share plus the additional perquisite tax @ 36% of the fair value.
(iii) Within two days of receipt of credit of the shares in the DP A/c of the employee, the Applicant will sell the RSUs to the extent of cashless funding plus transaction charges and cover the amount spent by them.
Guidance sought
In the light of the contemplated transaction, the Applicant sought informal guidance as to whether as a SEBI registered broker they are eligible to fund RSUs and if yes, to what maximum extent.
Provisions Involved
Regulations 9(2) of SEBI (Share Based Employee Benefit) Regulations, 2014.[i]
Informal Guidance by SEBI
(i) Interpreting Regulation 9(2) which allows cashless funding of ESOS or SAR and corresponding adjustment with sale proceeds, SEBI in the informal guidance stated that if the listed company permits, the Applicant may fund the cashless transaction at the exercise price, and adjust the same against the sale proceeds of some or all of the shares.
(ii) Also, SEBI went on to state that the SBEB Regulations do not have any maximum limit on amount per unit/security that may be funded.
The letter of SEBI can be read at: https://www.sebi.gov.in/sebi_data/commondocs/jul-2020/Informal%20Guidance%20Letter%20by%20SEBI%20W2W_p.pdf
| As per the Informal Guidance [Scheme] 2003 of SEBI, the guidance provided is applicable only to the Applicant, and is should not be construed as a conclusive decision or determination of any question of law or fact by SEBI, and is also not an Order u/S 15T of SEBI Act, 1992. |
[i] Regulation 9(2), SBEB: No person other than the employee to whom the option, SAR or other benefit is granted shall be entitled to the benefit arising out of such option, SAR, benefit etc.
Provided that in case of ESOS or SAR, under cashless exercise, the company may itself fund or permit the empaneled stock brokers to fund the payment of exercise price which shall be adjusted against the sale proceeds of some or all the shares, subject to the provisions of the applicable law or regulations.
Authored by Aishwarya Lakshmi V. M.
| Applicant: RS Software (India) Ltd. |
Date of the guidance: 17.09.2019 |
Factual Background
(i) R S Software (India) Ltd. had started an employee Trust in the name
Authored by Aishwarya Lakshmi VM
| Applicant: Mirza International Ltd. |
Date of the guidance: 10.06.2020 |
Factual Background
(i) The Managing Director of the Company who individually holds 11.27% shares in the company is desirous of gifting his shares to his daughters. The daughters are married and leading a separate life, away from the father.
(ii) The daughters who are prospective recipients of the shares do not want themselves to be falling within the
SEBI has released a Consultation Paper, proposing three (3) options, with respect to listed companies that have a resolution plan approved by the NCLT, in respect of the minimum pubic shareholding (
Authored by Shrutakeerti
This is in continuation to our article on the highlights and salient features of the Consumer Protection Act, 2019, (
With the rapid growth of internet and dilution of geographical boundaries, marketing of products and services through websites and domain names are becoming an increasingly important mode of brand building and channels of commerce for trademark owners. Domain name/website names forms an essential part of the trademark assets and represent the virtual address of an organisation in the internet space in relation to its brand that is the subject matter of such domain name.
The domain names indicating source from Indian jurisdiction is
In the light of the COVID-19 pandemic situation prevailing in the country, the CGPDTM has decided to conduct show cause hearings for trademark matters pursuant to the Trademarks Rules, 2017, through video conferencing and in this regard, a public notice was issued on 26th August 2020 that has requested the Applicants and Trademark Agents/Attorneys to give their consent and confirm their participation for hearings through video conferencing. Accordingly, Applicants/Trademark Agents/Attorneys have been directed to provide their consent by sending an email to tlahearing-tmr@gov.in with the subject
The CGPDTM has been issuing public notices[1]
Vide this notification, CSR Rules and Schedule VII of the Act has been amended, to enable the R&D expenditure incurred by companies in R&D of Covid-19 vaccine, drug(s) and medical devices in their normal course of business, to account it as CSR expenditure, for financial years 2020-2021, 2021-2022 and 2022-2023, so long as these companies carry out their R&D in collaboration with the institutes or organisation mentioned in item (ix) of Schedule VII to the Act- such as Central/State Government/Public Sector Undertaking funded incubators, IITs, National Laboratories established by certain Central Government Departments
Ministry of Corporate Affairs (MCA) vide aforementioned circulars had enabled conducting general meetings of members through video conference (VC) or through other audio-visual means (OVAM).
As per provisions of Companies Act 2013, all special resolutions are required to be filed with the Registrar of Companies (ROC) within 30 days of passing of the resolution.
Authored by Ammu Brigit
Patanjali Ayurveda Limited (Patanjali) along with Divya Pharmacy Limited in its recent press conference launched ayurvedic medicines claiming to be the first ayurvedic cure medicines with 100% recovery within seven days for Covid-19. Taking notice of this announcement, Ministry of Ayurveda, Yoga, Neuropathy, Unani, Siddha and Homeopathy (Ministry of AYUSH) instructed Patanjali to stop advertisements, and sought from it the name and composition of the medicines, site/hospital where the research study was conducted, protocol, sample size, Institutional Ethics Committee (IEC) clearance, Clinical Trial Registry-India (CTRI) registration, result data of the study. In the context, in this article we look into the legal position with regard to the research, manufacturing and advertising of Ayurvedic medicines in India.
Manufacturing of Ayurvedic Medicines
Under section 33EEC of Drugs and Cosmetics Act,1940 (DCA) read together with Part XVI of Drugs and Cosmetics Rules 1945 (DCR), a person intending to manufacture any ayurvedic medicine should obtain appropriate license after fulfilling the conditions of license under DCA and DCR.
The AYUSH ministry taking note of the gap in DCR as it does not contain specific regulatory provision requiring conduct of clinical trials for Ayurveda, Siddha, Unani and Homeopathic drugs (AYUSH Drugs), and recognising the need for scientifically generated clinical data for validation and credibility of drugs for Covid-19, came up with a notification dated 21st April 2020.
Under this notification, the AYUSH Ministry required scientists, researchers, clinicians of any recognised systems of medicine under Indian Medicine Central Council Act 1970 (IMCC Act), National Medical Commission Act, 2019 (NMC Act), and Homeopathy Central Council Act 1973 (HCC Act) undertaking research on cure or prevention of Covid-19 through Ayurveda, Siddha, Unani and Homeopathy systems (
Authored by Vishaka
In a recent development, triggered by the release of a web-series titled
Authored by Ammu Brigit
Informed consent being one of the fundamental principles of good clinical practice is a legal requirement prior to conduct of surgeries or other medical procedures by doctors/hospitals. Failure by a
Authored by Ammu Brigit
The home delivery of medicines has become a necessity especially during the when everyone is staying safe at their own homes.
The Ministry of Corporate Affairs has vide notification dated 26th May 2020 and 23rd June 2020 included the spends towards the following activities as expenditure towards CSR activities:
(i) contribution to Prime Minister
i. BOARD MEETINGS – BUSINESS CONTINUITY THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCING
Ministry of Corporate Affairs (MCA) had Vide notification dated 19th March 2020 waived the requirement of physical presence of directors in the board meeting, in respect of matters which required the quorum (minimum number of directors to constitute a valid meeting) to be present in one place. This relaxation was available till 30th June 2020.
MCA had Vide notification dated 23rd June 2020 extended the aforesaid relaxation by further period of 3 months; 30th September 2020.
ii. HOLDING OF EXTRA ORDINARY GENNERAL MEETINGS THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCING (VC) OR OTHER AUDIO-VISUAL MEANS (OAVM) (
As the concerts and events are conducted virtually now in the wake of COVID-19, Indian Performing Rights Society (IPRS), the registered copyright society in India for artists proposed a
A trademark is understood in common parlance as any word or words or a logo used in relation to any trade or business that is primarily intended to indicate source from which any goods or service offerings have originated. Trademarks also help such businesses and brand owners to differentiate their products and services from other persons and business owners.
However, over the years the concept of branding has constantly evolved owing to changing consumer choices and ease of availability of competitive products and services, which has led to brand owners innovating and infusing fresh thoughts in their branding to keep consumers engaged. This has consequentially also led to brand owners become very conscious about protection of their novel branding ideas to create exclusivity in their favour in respect of such trademarks. Brand and trademark owners have constantly tested the law relating to trademarks in seeking legal protection of these novel and unconventional trademarks and have over the years been successful in securing such protection. The trademark law has also evolved over the years to accommodate such brand and trademark protection strategies adopted by trademark proprietors.
The Trademarks Act, 1999 (the
Authored by Aanchal M Nichani
The Consumer Protection Act, 2019 (
Authored by Vishaka
Did you know that the song
Authored by Sri Vidhya Kumar
Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises (
Authored by Aanchal M Nichani
Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (Amendment) Ordinance, 2020
On 5th June, 2020, the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (Amendment) Ordinance was promulgated to amend the provisions of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (
The CGPDTM had issued a Public Notice dated 18th May 2020 with respect to due dates for completion of various acts/proceedings, filing of reply/document, payment of fees, etc. In the said Public Notices the CGPDTM notified that the deadlines falling between 15.03.2020 and 17.05.2020 stand extended to 01.06.2020. It is worthwhile to note that the Hon
Authored by Shyamolima Sengupta & Saisunder N.V
In the recent judgement of Imagine Marketing Pvt Ltd v. Exotic Mile, the plaintiffs who are
Authored by Shyamolima Sengupta & Saisunder N.V
Heraclitus, the well-known Greek philosopher rightly said that-
Authored by Sharadaa
Letter of Undertaking (LUT) is a document submitted by the exporter in order to export goods or services without payment of taxes under the Goods and Services Tax regime.
On due consideration of the difficulties faced by the exporters in submission of an LUT for exporting goods/services without payment of tax in the earlier tax regime, the Central Board of Excise and Customs vide Notification No. 37/2017
Authored by Lakshmi Rengarajan
DISRUPTION OF OPERATIONS DUE TO COVID-19 PANDEMIC:
Under the current scenario of COVID-19 pandemic and the consequent lockdown, various business organisations are facing severe impact on the performance as there is restriction on the operation of its activities.
SEBI (Listing Obligation and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2015 (
Authored by N. Umayaparvathi
With the lockdown declared across the country spread across four versions and 60 days, one question that was constantly raised was whether tenants are entitled to claim waiver/suspension of payment of rent. The Delhi High Court, in a recent judgment in Ramanand v. Dr. Girish Soni (decided on 21.05.2020), addressed the issue and set out certain parameters to be considered while deciding whether a tenant could claim exemption from payment of rent on account of the lockdown, and the same is discussed in this article.
Factual background:
The Petitioner (Tenant), a dentist, having possession of premises under lease deed from 1st February 1975, for a rent of Rs. 300/- per month, was vide order dated 18th March 2017 (of the Rent Controller appointed under the Delhi Rent Control Act) ordered to vacate the premises, which on appeal to Rent Control Tribunal was upheld. The Tenant filed the instant revision petition before the Delhi HC (Court), and Court had stayed the eviction order subject to the condition that the Tenant would pay a sum of Rs. 3.5 lakhs per month as rent with effect from October 2017. It was also set out that any default in payment would vacate the stay granted and entitle the Landlord to execute the order of eviction.
In these circumstances, the Tenant had moved an urgent application for suspension of payment of rent during the lockdown period on the ground that the pandemic and lockdown are force majeure beyond the Tenant
TELEMEDICINE PRACTICE GUIDELINES IN INDIA
Authored by Ammu Brigit
Authored by Aneeruth Suresh & Adit N Bhuva
The Government of India (
Authored by Aanchal M. Nichani
A writ petition was filed before the Hon
Authored by Ammu Brigit
In a recent interesting judgement, the Hon
Authored by Vishaka. S
Introduction:
Be it an affordable daily-use product such as an energy drink endorsed by Indian Cricketer Virat Kohli or an expensive commodity such as gold or diamonds endorsed by top Indian actors like Amitabh Bachchan or Aishwarya Rai, people in India are largely influenced by celebrity endorsed products and its consumption in daily households are nothing to be surprised of. In a country like India with people worshipping celebrities such as actors, cricketers or even politicians as
Authored by Aanchal M. Nichani
With the advent of social media platforms, emerged a new vocation – social media influencer, who with their following and reach on social media attempt to influence and sway a viewer/consumer towards purchasing or refraining from purchasing a product available in the market. Most brands and companies make utmost commercial use of the fan following base and reach these social media influencers enjoy in order to promote their product.
The recent legal battle between Marico Limited (
Authored by Vishnu Ravi Shankar
Introduction
A Founder
Authored by CS Priyadharshini
The entire world is crippled by Covid-19 and many are grasping at straws to shorten the diagnostic time by way of rapid test diagnostics kits, ventilators and other equipment to handle the scarcity at hospitals and of course a vaccine. To confront these challenging times, many inventors are coming up with novel ideas to address the shortage of medical supplies and also preventive measures.
In this article we address the precautions that an inventor needs to take if he intends to protect the intellectual property associated with his Covid-19 device or vaccine.
Reasons why an invention has to be protected
Any invention adds value to the society by way of introducing advanced domain-specific technology. Once the inventor secures his rights over his invention, he can license it to others so that a larger section of the society benefits from his invention, and he can also realise the monetary value of his contribution to the society at large. This would enable the inventor to make sure that his Covid-19 related invention is used in the way he had thought about it and any suggestion for modification that comes from a third party is also addressed and validated by him.
Precautions to be taken
It is crucial for the inventors to be aware of the strategy to protect their invention before it hits the road. Here are some of the key aspects that are to be studiously followed when an invention is in place but not yet protected.
Do
Amidst the COVID-19, Ministry of Corporate Affairs (MCA) vide its General Circulars No.14/2020 dated 08th April 2020 and No.17/2020 dated 13th April 2020 has, with respect to matters requiring approval of shareholders, requested the Companies, to obtain shareholders
Authored by Aanchal M. Nichani
The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (
The Reserve Bank of India (RBI), vide A.P. (DIR Series) Circular No. 27 dated 1st April 2020, has increased the period of realisation and repatriation of the export proceeds to India in respect of the export of goods or software or services, from 9 (nine) months to 15 (fifteen) months from the date of such corresponding exports.
The RBI has made the above relaxation in pursuance of the representations received from various Exporters Trade bodies owing to the current outbreak of pandemic COVID-19 and it is to be noted that it is applicable only in respect of those exports that are made on or before 31, July 2020.
It is to be noted that the above mentioned relaxation shall not be applicable for those export of goods/services to the warehouses established outside India by the respective exporters and the timelines for realisation and repatriation of the export proceeds in respect of such exports shall remain unchanged i.e. fifteen(15) months from the date of shipment of such exports.
Further, the said extension of six (6) months will enable the exporters to realise their receipts, especially from COVID-19 affected countries and also provide sufficient scope for the exporters to negotiate their export contracts with the corresponding buyers abroad in order to realise the export proceeds within the extended timelines.
As the circular does not explicitly mention the date from which the relaxation would become applicable, it can be construed to be applicable from 1st April 2020, i.e. exports made on or after 1st April 2020, being the date of the circular. Nevertheless, it is advisable that the exporters approach their respective AD Category-1 banks to seek the clarity as to whether this extension of timelines will be applicable even for those export of goods/software/services occurred prior to the date of this circular i.e. 1st April 2020.
Authored by: Adit N Bhuva & Sri Vidhya Kumar.
NAME OF THE SCHEME:
Authored by Aanchal M. Nichani
On 24th March 2020, the Central Government by notification, revised the threshold limit of the amount of default for the applicability of the provisions of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, from Rs. 1 Lakh to Rs. 1 crore.
The said revision in the threshold has come in the wake of the on-going crisis and battle with the Covid-19 outbreak. The intention of the said notification is to ease out the pressure on small sized companies and MSME and not drive them into insolvency and bankruptcy.
In many of our foreign trips, we often buy some newly launched electronic or electrical products which are either not yet available/launched in our country or are offered at higher prices. While such procurements are intended for personal use or consumption, the concept of
While one may argue that the said Novel Corona Virus situation that has turned into a global pandemic can be treated as a force majeure event that has happened beyond the control of the contracting parties, it may be a good idea to have such pandemic and epidemic situations also defined and specifically carved out as a force majeure event in order to avoid unnecessary disputes and interpretational issues. Accordingly, it is advisable to clearly define the word
A. Extension of time for filing GST Returns:
Date for filing GST returns due in the months of March, April and May 2020 have been extended and the same have been permitted to be filed by the last week of June 2020 (Staggering of dates for various states as already in place shall apply
SEBI has granted following relaxations from compliance stipulations specified under the SEBI (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2015 (
| S.No. |
Category |
Present requirement |
Relaxation |
| 1 |
Relaxation with respect to Directors and Meetings: |
| a |
Gap between two board meetings (for unlisted companies) |
Presently the gap between two board meetings cannot exceed 120 days. |
The Ministry has provided a one-time relaxation for the gap between two board consecutive board meetings, which may extend to 180 days. This relaxation is applicable till next 2 quarters i.e., till 30th September 2020.
|
| b |
Gap between two board /audit committee meetings (for listed companies)
A series of Public Notices have been issued by the Indian IP and Copyright office over the past few days in relation to cancellation of all hearings as under:
A. Notice dated March 16, 2020, of the Trade Marks Registry:
The Controller General of Patent, Design and Trademarks has on the 25th March 2020 issued a Public Notice that all the IP Offices in India shall remain closed from the 25th March 2020. It has further extended all deadlines and due dates in respect of filing of documents in any matter that falls due during this period of closure until the date of next day on which the offices re-open.
While this notice issued by the Controller General of Patent, Design and Trademarks definitely benefits the concerned stakeholders and grants a time extension during this period of crisis but there may be several practical issues that may arise as and when the offices re-open given the voluminous filings that can potentially be made by various stakeholders to comply with the deadlines for multiple matters falling on the same day viz., the date on which the offices re-open.
In this regard it is to be noted that as mentioned earlier the Hon
Business continuity is essential even in these extra-ordinary times of Covid-19. To keep off the pandemic the essential requirement is social distancing.
The Ministry of Corporate Affairs (
Authors: Sri Vidhya Kumar & Lakshmi Rengarajan
Ministry of Corporate Affairs has amended Companies (Incorporation) Rules 2014 on 6th February 2020, for facilitating
Author: N.V. Saisunder
Recently, in August 2019 The
Author: N.V.Saisunder
Recently the Hon
Author: N.V.Saisunder
Recently in December 2019, the Delhi High Court confirmed vide its order that not all Computer Programs are hit by the bar on patenting under the provisions of Section 3 (k) of the Indian Patents Act, 1970 (the
Ministry of Corporate Affairs vide its notification dated 3rd January 2020, has modified the rules relating to secretarial audit. The audit which was applicable only to listed and unlisted companies with a threshold of Rs. 50 crores paid-up capital or Rs. 250 crores turnover, has by this amendment been modified to be applicable even for private limited company, if ….Read more
[Author: Shyamolima Sengupta]
Intellectual Propriety Rights (IP Rights) holders are under constant threat of counterfeit products in the market, which is increasing exponentially with growing technology and increase in cross-border commerce between countries. Interestingly, such counterfeit goods may not always be manufactured and circulated for trade and commerce in the domestic market but may also enter illegally through the customs frontiers of a country. Therefore, it is crucial for IP Rights holders to keep a close watch and take appropriate and timely action against imports that can potentially be infringing on the rights of such IP Rights holders.
With an intention to protect the IP Rights of proprietors in India and also to honour India
[Authors Mr. Saisunder and Ms. Srividya Sundaresan]
The provisions of Section 25 of the Trademarks Act, 1999 (
[First published in Lexology on 3rd October 2019. To read Article in Lexology Click here]
 AANCHAL M NICHANI
ASSOCIATE
[First published in Lexology on 19th September 2019. To read Article in Lexology click here]
 MR. N V SAISUNDER
PARTNER – IPR & TECHNOLOGY LAW PRACTICE
 MS. AMMU BRIGIT
ASSOCIATE
[First published in World Intellectual Property Review on 19th September 2019. To read Article in WIPR click here]
MR. N V SAISUNDER
PARTNER – IPR & TECHNOLOGY LAW PRACTICE
MS. SHYAMOLIMA SENGUPTA
SENIOR ASSOCIATE
[The article was authored by Ms. Srividhya & Ms. Nagalakshmi]
A well
MR. ANEERUTH SURESH
SENIOR ASSOCIATE CORPORATE ADVISORY & TECHNOLOGY LAW PRACTICE
MR. ESHWAR SABAPATHY
MANAGING PARTNER
The Government of India has notified the Foreign Exchange Management (Non-debt Instruments) Rules, 2019 (hereinafter
[First published in World Intellectual Property Review on 24th May 2019. To read Article in WIPR Click here]
MR. N V SAISUNDER
PARTNER – IPR & TECHNOLOGY LAW PRACTICE
MS. SRIVIDYA SUNDARESAN
HEAD
[First published in World Intellectual Property Review on 4th April 2019. To read Article in WIPR click here]
MR. N V SAISUNDER
PARTNER – IPR & TECHNOLOGY LAW PRACTICE
MS. SHYAMOLIMA SENGUPTA
SENIOR ASSOCIATE
[First published in Lexology on 28th February 2019. To read Article in Lexology click here]
MS. SRI VIDHYA KUMAR
HEAD
[First published in Lexology on 27th June 2019. To read Article in Lexology click here]
MR. N V SAISUNDER
PARTNER – IPR & TECHNOLOGY LAW PRACTICE
MS. SHYAMOLIMA SENGUPTA
SENIOR ASSOCIATE
[First published in World Intellectual Property Review on 18th February 2019. To read Article in WIPR Click here]
MR. N V SAISUNDER
PARTNER – IPR & TECHNOLOGY LAW PRACTICE
MS. AANCHAL M NICHANI
ASSOCIATE
[First published in Lexology on 7th December 2018. To read Article in Lexology Click here]
MS. SRIVIDYA SUNDARESAN
HEAD
[First published in World Intellectual Property Review on 12th August 2019. To read Article in WIPR click here]
MR. N V SAISUNDER
PARTNER – IPR & TECHNOLOGY LAW PRACTICE
MS. S. VISHAKA
ASSOCIATE – IPR & TECHNOLOGY LAW PRACTICE
PQ:
[First published in World Intellectual Property Review on 30th November 2018. To read Article in WIPR click here]
MR. N V SAISUNDER
PARTNER – IPR & TECHNOLOGY LAW PRACTICE
MS. S. VISHAKA
ASSOCIATE – IPR & TECHNOLOGY LAW PRACTICE
STATUTORY AND JUDICIAL RECOGNITION OF DOCTRINE OF TRANS-BORDER REPUTATION OF TRADEMARKS VIS-
Vendor payments and demand notice under Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (the
| | | | | | | 
