Consent, apaar and the dpdp act: Key Takeaways from the Supreme Court’s order

Authored by Ammu Brigit BACKGROUND On 20 July 2026, the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India disposed of a writ petition under Article 32 challenging the constitutional validity of the Automated Permanent Academic Account Registry (“APAAR”) Scheme. The Bench expressly held that the processing of personal data under APAAR is governed by the Digital Personal Data … Read more

When the state targets the code: India’s bitchat takedown order and the constitutional limits of digital censorship

Authored by Saisunder NV and Ammu Brigit INTRODUCTION: On the night of 23 July 2026, India’s Indian Cyber Crime Coordination Centre (I4C) under the Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) issued a takedown notice to GitHub directing the removal of source code repositories of BitChat a decentralised, Bluetooth-based messaging application developed by Block, Inc., the fintech … Read more

Whose address is it anyway: the Supreme Court’s rifilis engineering ruling and a lesson in data accuracy for the dpdp era

Authored by Ammu Brigit On 22 May 2026, the Supreme Court of India delivered a short but pointed order in M/S Rifilis Engineering Pvt. Ltd. vs. Arjun Gupta, arising out of a Special Leave Petition against a judgment of the Allahabad High Court. On its face, the case is an ordinary industrial dispute about an … Read more

DISCLAIMER & CONFIRMATION

As per the rules of the Bar Council of India, we are not permitted to solicit work and advertise. By clicking on the "I Agree" button below, the user acknowledges the following:

  • There has been no advertisement, personal communication, solicitation, invitation or inducement of any sort whatsoever from us or any of our members to solicit any work through this website.
  • The user wishes to gain more information about us for his/her own information and use.
  • The information about us is provided to the user only on his/her specific request and any information obtained or materials downloaded from this website is completely at the user's volition and any transmission, receipt or use of this site would not create any lawyer-client relationship.
  • The description anywhere on this website of the results of any specific case or transaction does not mean or suggest that similar results can or could be obtained in any other matter.

The information provided under this website is solely available at your request for informational purposes only and should not be interpreted as soliciting or advertisement. We are not liable for any consequence of any action taken by the user relying on material / information provided under this website. In cases where the user has any legal issues, he/she must seek independent legal advice.