Month: August 2026

WHEN YOUR NAME IS TAKEN: DOMAIN NAME DISPUTE RESOLUTION, CYBERSQUATTING, AND THE LIMITS OF POLICY-BASED JUSTICE IN BRAND PROTECTION

by

Authored by Saisunder N.V and Vishaka Introduction In the physical world, a trademark distinguishes a business; in the digital world, a domain name is more- it is an address, an identity, and often the first point of consumer interaction. Losing control of a domain name can therefore mean losing the gateway to a business’s online … Read more

Maternity Leave and the “Two-Child Norm”: Telangana High Court Clarifies Position Where First Delivery Results in Twins

by

Authored by Gopika Introduction Service rules governing maternity leave in most States, including Telangana, condition eligibility on the employee having “less than two surviving children.” Read literally, this formulation produces an anomalous outcome where a woman’s first pregnancy results in twins: she is deemed to have exhausted her eligibility in a single confinement, even though … Read more

When Women Harass Women: What Does the POSH Act Say? Rethinking the Gender of the Perpetrator

by

Authored by Vishaka S Introduction: When the “Wrongdoer” Does Not Fit the Stereotype The Prevention of Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace Act, 2013 (“POSH Act”) was enacted with a clear and compelling purpose to protect women from sexual harassment at the workplace and provide them with an effective mechanism for prevention and redressal. Its … Read more

INDIA’S FIRST SMELL MARK: A NEW FRONTIER IN TRADEMARK LAW

by

Authored by Keerthana Krishna When most people think of a trademark, they imagine a brand name or a logo. However, modern branding goes far beyond words. Today, businesses also protect elements like colours, shapes, sounds, tastes and scents. These are known as unconventional trademarks. However, such marks face several legal and practical challenges, including satisfying … Read more

Elevator Companies on Notice: Supreme Court Recognises Lifts as “Common Carriers” and Imposes a Non-Delegable Duty of Care

by

Authored by Mahima. Introduction In a significant development for product liability and consumer protection jurisprudence, the Hon’ble Supreme Court, in M/s. OTIS Elevator Co. (India) Ltd. v. Rashmi Handa & Ors. (Civil Appeal No. 4081 of 2014, decided on July 29, 2026), has fundamentally altered the legal framework governing liability arising out of elevator accidents. … Read more

Consent, APAAR and the DPDP Act: Key Takeaways from the Supreme Court’s order

by

Authored by Ammu Brigit BACKGROUND On 20 July 2026, the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India disposed of a writ petition under Article 32 challenging the constitutional validity of the Automated Permanent Academic Account Registry (“APAAR”) Scheme. The Bench expressly held that the processing of personal data under APAAR is governed by the Digital Personal Data … Read more

When the state targets the code: India’s bitchat takedown order and the constitutional limits of digital censorship

by

Authored by Saisunder NV and Ammu Brigit INTRODUCTION: On the night of 23 July 2026, India’s Indian Cyber Crime Coordination Centre (I4C) under the Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) issued a takedown notice to GitHub directing the removal of source code repositories of BitChat a decentralised, Bluetooth-based messaging application developed by Block, Inc., the fintech … Read more

Whose address is it anyway: the Supreme Court’s Rifilis Engineering ruling and a lesson in data accuracy for the DPDP era

by

Authored by Ammu Brigit On 22 May 2026, the Supreme Court of India delivered a short but pointed order in M/S Rifilis Engineering Pvt. Ltd. vs. Arjun Gupta, arising out of a Special Leave Petition against a judgment of the Allahabad High Court. On its face, the case is an ordinary industrial dispute about an … Read more

DISCLAIMER & CONFIRMATION

As per the rules of the Bar Council of India, we are not permitted to solicit work and advertise. By clicking on the "I Agree" button below, the user acknowledges the following:

  • There has been no advertisement, personal communication, solicitation, invitation or inducement of any sort whatsoever from us or any of our members to solicit any work through this website.
  • The user wishes to gain more information about us for his/her own information and use.
  • The information about us is provided to the user only on his/her specific request and any information obtained or materials downloaded from this website is completely at the user's volition and any transmission, receipt or use of this site would not create any lawyer-client relationship.
  • The description anywhere on this website of the results of any specific case or transaction does not mean or suggest that similar results can or could be obtained in any other matter.

The information provided under this website is solely available at your request for informational purposes only and should not be interpreted as soliciting or advertisement. We are not liable for any consequence of any action taken by the user relying on material / information provided under this website. In cases where the user has any legal issues, he/she must seek independent legal advice.